Segment
1. Kleber Dynaxer UHP Upper-middle2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer UHP vs. Sava Intensa UHP 2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Kleber) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava). Kleber is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Kleber summer tyres are slightly better rated (64%) than Sava (43%). In this particular case, the Sava Intensa UHP 2 has a better rating of 73% compared to 68% of the Kleber Dynaxer UHP. The first tyre test of Kleber Dynaxer UHP was done in 2019, compared to 2017 when was the Sava Intensa UHP 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 225/45 R18 test, where both the Dynaxer UHP and the Intensa UHP 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Kleber Dynaxer UHP | Sava Intensa UHP 2 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R17 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Sava Intensa UHP 2 11.31
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Satisfactory2. Kleber Dynaxer UHP Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kleber Dynaxer UHP Satisfactory2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Still recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Sava Intensa UHP 2 72 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Price/value
Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Kleber Dynaxer UHP Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer UHP | 64.5 | 28 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 61.7 | 27.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer UHP | 34,1 | 32,2 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 34,7 | 35,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Kleber Dynaxer UHP Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Good | 2- | 2+ | 1- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer UHP | 35,9 | 32,1 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 35,7 | 32,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||