Segment
1. Michelin Primacy 4+ Premium2. Nexen N Fera Primus Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Nexen). Generally, Nexen summer tyres are slightly better rated (68%) than Michelin (63%). In this particular case, the Nexen N Fera Primus has a better rating of 80% compared to 79% of the Michelin Primacy 4+. The first tyre test of Michelin Primacy 4+ was done in 2023, compared to 2022 when was the Nexen N Fera Primus first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Primacy 4+ and the N Fera Primus were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Michelin Primacy 4+ | Nexen N Fera Primus | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R15 - R19 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin Primacy 4+ Premium2. Nexen N Fera Primus Lowcost
2. Nexen N Fera Primus 12.67
1. Michelin Primacy 4+ Highly recommended2. Nexen N Fera Primus Satisfactory
2. Nexen N Fera Primus Satisfactory
Name | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Michelin Primacy 4+ Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
Nexen N Fera Primus Rating: Satisfactory | |||||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
Michelin Primacy 4+ | 36,3 | 27,7 | |||||
Nexen N fera Primus | 37,2 | 27,7 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,7 | |||||
Michelin Primacy 4+ Rating: Good | 1,7 | 2,2 | |||||
Nexen N Fera Primus Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 3,1 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
Michelin Primacy 4+ Rating: Good | 1,6 | 2,3 | |||||
Nexen N Fera Primus Rating: Good | 3,1 | 2,3 | |||||
Show test details |