• 14 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Nokian WR Snowproof P vs. Fulda Kristall Control HP2

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Fulda (42%). In this particular case, the Nokian WR Snowproof P has a better rating of 62% compared to 56% of the Fulda Kristall Control HP2. The first tyre test of Nokian WR Snowproof P was done in 2021, compared to 2017 when was the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the WR Snowproof P and the Kristall Control HP2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian WR Snowproof P dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (54%) of the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 also have B wet ratings.

# Nokian WR Snowproof P
/62%
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
/56%

Add to comparison

Nokian
Fulda
DimensionsR17 - R21 R15 - R19
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test32,825,4
Nokian WR Snowproof P3626,2
Fulda Kristall Control HP236,826,3
Show test details
Autozeitung
Name WetDrySnow
Best values in test147143147
Nokian WR Snowproof P
Rating: Recommended for economical driving
84143 129
Fulda Kristall Control HP296110142
Show test details
ADAC
Name WetDrySnowIceNoiseWear
Best values in test1,61,91,52,12,71,5
Nokian WR Snowproof P
Rating: Satisfactory
3,32,22,72,1 2,82,5
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
Rating: Satisfactory
3,03,22,42,53,72,5
Show test details