In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Fulda (42%). In this particular case, the Nokian WR Snowproof P has a better rating of 62% compared to 56% of the Fulda Kristall Control HP2. The first tyre test of Nokian WR Snowproof P was done in 2021, compared to 2017 when was the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the WR Snowproof P and the Kristall Control HP2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian WR Snowproof P dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (54%) of the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 also have B wet ratings.
# | Nokian WR Snowproof P
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R17 - R21 | R15 - R19 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 70 dB
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
Nokian WR Snowproof P | 36 | 26,2 | |||||
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 36,8 | 26,3 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 147 | 143 | 147 | ||||
Nokian WR Snowproof P Rating: Recommended for economical driving | 84 | 143 | 129 | ||||
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 96 | 110 | 142 | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,9 | 1,5 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 1,5 | |
Nokian WR Snowproof P Rating: Satisfactory | 3,3 | 2,2 | 2,7 | 2,1 | 2,8 | 2,5 | |
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,0 | 3,2 | 2,4 | 2,5 | 3,7 | 2,5 | |
Show test details |