Segment
1. Sava Eskimo S3+ Lowcost2. Nexen Winguard Snow G3 WH21 Lowcost
Comparison: Sava Eskimo S3+ vs. Nexen Winguard Snow G3 WH21
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Nexen). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Sava winter tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Nexen (43%). In this particular case, the Nexen Winguard Snow G3 WH21 has a better rating of 56% compared to 46% of the Sava Eskimo S3+. The first tyre test of Sava Eskimo S3+ was done in 2015, compared to 2020 when was the Nexen Winguard Snow G3 WH21 first tested.
| # | Sava Eskimo S3+ | Nexen Winguard Snow G3 WH21 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R13 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Sava Eskimo S3+ 12.2
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Sava Eskimo S3+ Satisfactory2. Nexen Winguard Snow G3 WH21 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nexen Winguard Snow G3 WH21 Satisfactory2. Sava Eskimo S3+ Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Sava Eskimo S3+ 68 dB