Segment
1. Pirelli Cinturato Winter Premium2. Sava Eskimo S3+ Lowcost
Comparison: Sava Eskimo S3+ vs. Pirelli Cinturato Winter
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Italy (Pirelli). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Pirelli winter tyres are slightly better rated (68%) than Sava (61%). In this particular case, the Pirelli Cinturato Winter has a better rating of 63% compared to 46% of the Sava Eskimo S3+. The first tyre test of Sava Eskimo S3+ was done in 2015, compared to 2016 when was the Pirelli Cinturato Winter first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 185/65 R15 test, where both the Eskimo S3+ and the Cinturato Winter were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 83% of Sava Eskimo S3+ has C wet grip rating, whereas 90% of Pirelli Cinturato Winter has B rating.
| # | Sava Eskimo S3+ | Pirelli Cinturato Winter | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Sava Eskimo S3+ 12.2
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Pirelli Cinturato Winter Highly recommended2. Sava Eskimo S3+ Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Pirelli Cinturato Winter Conditionally recommended2. Sava Eskimo S3+ Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
2. Sava Eskimo S3+ 68 dB
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow handling
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel efficiency
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Ice braking
Ice lateral guidance
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 2,1 | 1,9 | 2,2 | 2,6 | 1,5 | 1,6 |
| Sava Eskimo S3+ Rating: Conditionally recommended | 2,8 | 3,6 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 2,7 | 2,0 | 2,0 |
| Pirelli Cinturato Winter Rating: Highly recommended | 2,0 | 2,4 | 2,4 | 2,4 | 2,6 | 2,5 | 2,4 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,7 | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,4 | 3,2 | 1,5 | 1,6 |
| Sava Eskimo S3+ Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 2,9 | 2,2 | 2,5 | 3,5 | 2,0 | 2,1 |
| Pirelli Cinturato Winter Rating: Satisfactory | 2,4 | 3,1 | 2,2 | 2,5 | 3,2 | 3,0 | 2,0 |
| Show test details | |||||||