14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: tyres similar to Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

Looking for a comparison of Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun to tyres that are made in similar dimensions? Here you can find detailed information based on tests, reviews and manufacturer's data.

#	Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun /72%	BFGoodrich Advantage /66%	Bridgestone Turanza T005 /91%	Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 /52%	Continental EcoContact 6 /48%	Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance /38%	Kleber Dynaxer HP3 /0%	Toyo Proxes Comfort /74%	Maxxis Premitra HP5 /56%

Dimensions	R14 - R22	R14 - R20	R14 - R22	R15 - R20	R13 - R22	R14 - R20	R14 - R19	R14 - R20	R15 - R18
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove

Today, we compare two summer tyres: Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun by Falken and BFGoodrich Advantage by BFGoodrich.

The Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun, a touring tyre made in Turkey, delivers a solid performance with an overall rating of 81%. Key strengths found among the test data include exceptional dry handling, good comfort, and impressive aquaplaning resistance. Despite slight weaknesses in environmental sustainability and efficiency shown in autobild 2024 test, this Falken tyre ranked 8th in the Autobild and Autozeitung tests out of 53 and 10 total tyres respectively and 6th in the ADAC test out of 50 tyres.

On the other hand, the BFGoodrich Advantage presented commendable comfort and dry handling but did not fare as well overall, with an overall score of 76%. While praised for its dynamic dry handling, low noise, and reasonable price in autobild 2024, it was noted for a tendency to understeer in wet conditions. In terms of test placement, it ranked as the 18th tyre in Autobild test out of 53, 21st in ADAC out of 50 tyres, and 9th in Autozeitung test out of 10 total tyres. It did surpass the Falken tyre in the Firmenauto test, bagging the 8th position out of 11.

When comparing Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun and BFGoodrich Advantage, the ZE310 Ecorun takes the lead in most of the tests thanks to its superior wet and dry handling capabilities. Its key shortcomings were environmental and logistical considerations, namely increased rolling resistance and lower than average sustainability. The BFGoodrich Advantage competes well in terms of comfort and lower rolling resistance but falls behind in wet condition handling.

In conclusion, if dry and wet handling are paramount for you, then you might lean towards the Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun. If comfort and cost-effectiveness are important considerations, then the BFGoodrich Advantage would be a suitable choice. Do bear in mind that neither of these tyres had a newer model replacing them at the time of writing. Be sure to check back for updates and more detailed individual tyre tests.

Segment

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium

2. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium

3. Continental EcoContact 6 Premium

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Premium

5. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Upper-middle

6. BFGoodrich Advantage Upper-middle

7. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 Upper-middle

8. Toyo Proxes Comfort Upper-middle

9. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 353

2. Continental EcoContact 6 319

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 153

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 150

5. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 149

6. BFGoodrich Advantage 146

7. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 125

8. Toyo Proxes Comfort 62

9. Maxxis Premitra HP5 56

Number of tests

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 33x

2. Maxxis Premitra HP5 31x

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 23x

4. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 22x

5. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 16x

6. Toyo Proxes Comfort 16x

7. BFGoodrich Advantage 13x

8. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 6x

9. Continental EcoContact 6 5x

Best position in test

1. Maxxis Premitra HP5 1.

2. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 1.

3. Bridgestone Turanza T005 1.

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2.

5. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 3.

6. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 4.

7. Toyo Proxes Comfort 5.

8. Continental EcoContact 6 7.

9. BFGoodrich Advantage 8.

Worst position in test

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 11.

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 12.

3. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 14.

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 15.

5. Toyo Proxes Comfort 17.

6. Maxxis Premitra HP5 20.

7. Continental EcoContact 6 23.

8. BFGoodrich Advantage 24.

9. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 45.

Average position in tests

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 4.09

2. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 4.91

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 5.5

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 6.57

5. Maxxis Premitra HP5 9.55

6. Toyo Proxes Comfort 9.69

7. Continental EcoContact 6 13

8. BFGoodrich Advantage 13.62

9. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 19

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 2025

2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 2025

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2025

4. Toyo Proxes Comfort 2025

5. Maxxis Premitra HP5 2024

6. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2023

7. Continental EcoContact 6 2022

8. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 2022

9. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 2020

Best rating in test

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Exemplary

2. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Exemplary

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Exemplary

4. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Exemplary

5. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Very good

6. BFGoodrich Advantage Good

7. Toyo Proxes Comfort Good

8. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 Satisfactory

9. Continental EcoContact 6 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Good

2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Good

3. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 Satisfactory

4. Continental EcoContact 6 Satisfactory

5. Toyo Proxes Comfort Satisfactory

6. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Conditionally recommended

7. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Conditionally recommended

8. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Still recommended

9. BFGoodrich Advantage Sufficient

Wet

(Overall rating)

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance

80.7%

Bridgestone
Turanza T005

79%

Hankook
Ventus Prime3 K125

79%

Maxxis
Premitra HP5

73%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

71%

Kleber
Dynaxer HP3

70%

Toyo
Proxes Comfort

62%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

59%

Continental
EcoContact 6

48%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 82%

2. Maxxis Premitra HP5 74%

3. Bridgestone Turanza T005 69%

4. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 66%

5. BFGoodrich Advantage 62%

6. Toyo Proxes Comfort 59%

7. Continental EcoContact 6 57%

8. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 0%

9. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 0%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Maxxis Premitra HP5 85%

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 82%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 69%

4. Bridgestone Turanza T005 69%

5. BFGoodrich Advantage 63%

6. Toyo Proxes Comfort 59%

7. Continental EcoContact 6 51%

8. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 0%

9. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 0%

Wet handling

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 85%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 84%

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 68%

4. Maxxis Premitra HP5 66%

5. Toyo Proxes Comfort 66%

6. BFGoodrich Advantage 56%

7. Continental EcoContact 6 46%

8. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 0%

9. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 0%

Wet braking

1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 96%

2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 81%

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 77%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 69%

5. Maxxis Premitra HP5 68%

6. Toyo Proxes Comfort 60%

7. Continental EcoContact 6 42%

8. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 0%

9. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 0%

Wet circle cornering

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 96%

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 78%

3. Toyo Proxes Comfort 78%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 61%

5. Maxxis Premitra HP5 61%

6. Continental EcoContact 6 46%

7. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 0%

8. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 0%

9. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 0%

Wet side guide

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 86%

2. Toyo Proxes Comfort 82%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 79%

4. Maxxis Premitra HP5 61%

5. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 59%

6. BFGoodrich Advantage 54%

7. Continental EcoContact 6 0%

8. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 0%

9. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 0%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 A

2. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 A

3. BFGoodrich Advantage A

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance A

5. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun B

6. Continental EcoContact 6 B

7. Toyo Proxes Comfort ?

8. Maxxis Premitra HP5 ?

9. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Ventus Prime3 K125

94%

Kleber
Dynaxer HP3

87.7%

Bridgestone
Turanza T005

83%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance

83.1%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

69%

Toyo
Proxes Comfort

69%

Maxxis
Premitra HP5

68%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

67%

Continental
EcoContact 6

65%

Dry handling

1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 92%

2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 86%

3. Toyo Proxes Comfort 83%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 79%

5. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 76%

6. Maxxis Premitra HP5 67%

7. Continental EcoContact 6 51%

8. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 0%

9. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 0%

Dry braking

1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 95%

2. Continental EcoContact 6 79%

3. Bridgestone Turanza T005 76%

4. Toyo Proxes Comfort 77%

5. Maxxis Premitra HP5 73%

6. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 72%

7. BFGoodrich Advantage 67%

8. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 0%

9. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 0%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Continental
EcoContact 6

91%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

76%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance

76.7%

Hankook
Ventus Prime3 K125

73%

Maxxis
Premitra HP5

72%

Toyo
Proxes Comfort

71%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

70%

Bridgestone
Turanza T005

61%

Kleber
Dynaxer HP3

57.6%

Exterior noise

1. Continental EcoContact 6 95%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 81%

3. Maxxis Premitra HP5 75%

4. Toyo Proxes Comfort 70%

5. BFGoodrich Advantage 70%

6. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 69%

7. Bridgestone Turanza T005 61%

8. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 0%

9. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 0%

Comfort

1. Continental EcoContact 6 86%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 72%

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 72%

4. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 64%

5. Maxxis Premitra HP5 64%

6. Toyo Proxes Comfort 64%

7. Bridgestone Turanza T005 60%

8. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 0%

9. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 0%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 69 dB

2. Continental EcoContact 6 ?

3. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 ?

4. Maxxis Premitra HP5 ?

5. Toyo Proxes Comfort ?

6. Bridgestone Turanza T005 ?

7. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 ?

8. BFGoodrich Advantage ? dB

9. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun ? dB

Offroad

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Ventus Prime3 K125

94%

Maxxis
Premitra HP5

81.2%

Bridgestone
Turanza T005

81.9%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

72.3%

Toyo
Proxes Comfort

65.3%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance

0%

Continental
EcoContact 6

0%

Kleber
Dynaxer HP3

0%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

0%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Continental
EcoContact 6

83%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance

73.2%

Bridgestone
Turanza T005

71%

Kleber
Dynaxer HP3

68.8%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

65%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

65%

Toyo
Proxes Comfort

63%

Hankook
Ventus Prime3 K125

56%

Maxxis
Premitra HP5

56%

Rolling resistance

1. Continental EcoContact 6 100%

2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 96%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 71%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 71%

5. Toyo Proxes Comfort 57%

6. Maxxis Premitra HP5 52%

7. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 46%

8. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 0%

9. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 0%

Mileage

1. Continental EcoContact 6 77%

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 67%

3. Bridgestone Turanza T005 64%

4. Toyo Proxes Comfort 63%

5. BFGoodrich Advantage 60%

6. Maxxis Premitra HP5 52%

7. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 46%

8. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 0%

9. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 0%

Price/value

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 83%

2. Continental EcoContact 6 71%

3. Toyo Proxes Comfort 68%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 65%

5. Maxxis Premitra HP5 64%

6. Bridgestone Turanza T005 54%

7. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 50%

8. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 0%

9. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 0%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental EcoContact 6 A

2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 B

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance B

4. BFGoodrich Advantage C

5. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 C

6. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun E

7. Toyo Proxes Comfort ?

8. Maxxis Premitra HP5 ?

9. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild Summer tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Rating: Good
BFGoodrich Advantage Rating: Good
Toyo Proxes Comfort Rating: Good
Maxxis Premitra HP5 Rating: Satisfactory
Show test details

Autobild Summer tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	35,4	25,8
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun	36,5	28,0
BFGoodrich Advantage	37,4	29,1
Toyo Proxes Comfort	36,7	27,5
Maxxis Premitra HP5	36,2	28,4
Show test details

ADAC Summer tyre test 2023 205/55 R16

Name	Enviromental impact	Driving safety
Best values in test	1,3	1,8
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Rating: Good	2,7	2,1
BFGoodrich Advantage Rating: Good	2,8	2,9
Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Good	2,4	2,2
Toyo Proxes Comfort Rating: Good	2,5	2,7
Show test details

Autobild Summer tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Running costs
Best values in test	1	2+	1+
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Rating: Good	1-	2+	2-
BFGoodrich Advantage Rating: Good	2-	2+	2-
Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Good	1	2+	2-
Continental EcoContact 6 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2	3+
Toyo Proxes Comfort Rating: Satisfactory	2	2+	3+
Maxxis Premitra HP5 Rating: Satisfactory	2+	2-	3
Show test details

Autozeitung Summer tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Wet	Dry
Best values in test	146	134
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Rating: Satisfactory	120	104
BFGoodrich Advantage Rating: Sufficient	108	108
Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Highly recommended	137	127
Continental EcoContact 6 Rating: Good	101	134
Maxxis Premitra HP5 Rating: Highly recommended	146	106
Show test details

Autobild Summer tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	35,7	27,5
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun	36,1	28,2
BFGoodrich Advantage	36,3	31
Bridgestone Turanza T005	35,8	27,5
Continental EcoContact 6	36,4	32,7
Toyo Proxes Comfort	35,9	29,6
Maxxis Premitra HP5	37,3	28,9
Show test details

Firmenauto Summer tyre test 2021 195/55 R16

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	8,9	8,9	8,7	10	10
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Rating: Satisfactory	7,0	7,8	6,9	3	7
BFGoodrich Advantage Rating: Satisfactory	7,6	8,0	7,5	7	7
Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Good	8,1	8,1	8,0	10	6
Toyo Proxes Comfort Rating: Poor	5,7	6,2	7,4	5	7
Maxxis Premitra HP5 Rating: Satisfactory	7,8	7,8	7,8	6	10
Show test details

Autobild Summer tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2+	1
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2	2
BFGoodrich Advantage Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2+	2-
Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Exemplary	2	2	2-
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Good	1-	1-	3+
Toyo Proxes Comfort Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2+	2-
Maxxis Premitra HP5 Rating: Satisfactory	2	2+	3
Show test details

Autobild Summer tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	34,1	29,6
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun	35,8	31,4
BFGoodrich Advantage	36,7	31,9
Bridgestone Turanza T005	35,4	31,6
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125	34,1	29,6
Toyo Proxes Comfort	35,2	33,2
Maxxis Premitra HP5	35,0	32,2
Show test details

Comparison: tyres similar to Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands