Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium2. Michelin Alpin A4 Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (80%) than Bridgestone (46%). In this particular case, the Michelin Alpin A4 has a better rating of 70% compared to 37% of the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2016 185/65 R15 test, where both the Blizzak LM-001 and the Alpin A4 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 73% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 has B wet grip rating, whereas 95% of Michelin Alpin A4 has C rating. We also know where Blizzak LM-001 is made - Poland.
# | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | Michelin Alpin A4 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R14 - R21 | R14 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium2. Michelin Alpin A4 Premium
1. Michelin Alpin A4 Highly recommended
2. Michelin Alpin A4 Recommended
1. Michelin Alpin A4 70 dB
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,8 | 1,9 | 1,7 | 2,2 | 2,8 | 1 | 1,5 |
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: - | 2,8 | 2,6 | 1,9 | 2,9 | 3,6 | 2,5 | 2,0 |
Michelin Alpin A4 Rating: - | 2,4 | 2,0 | 2,4 | 2,4 | 3,5 | 1 | 2,5 |
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: - | 2- | 2- | 2+ | 1- | |||
Michelin Alpin A4 Rating: - | 2 | 2- | 1 | 1- | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 43,4 | 28,1 | |||||
Michelin Alpin A4 | 39,7 | 27,9 | |||||
Show test details |