Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (93%) than Hankook (83%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has a better rating of 88% compared to 78% of the Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 was done in 2019, compared to 2022 when was the Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2024 215/55 R17 test, where both the Blizzak LM-005 and the W462 Winter i*cept RS3 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 95% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has A wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 has B rating. We also know where Blizzak LM-005 is made - Italy/Hungary/Poland.
# | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
| Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R22 | R14 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium
1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Highly recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good
2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended
Name | Points total | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 392 | ||||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Test winner | 392 | ||||||
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Rating: Recommended | 369 | ||||||
Show test details |
Name | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Recommended | |||||||
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 | |||||||
Show test details |
Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2 | 2.1 | |||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good | 3.1 | 2.1 | |||||
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Rating: Good | 2.8 | 2.2 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,8 | 2,0 | |||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 3,2 | |||||
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,4 | 2,7 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Test winner | |||||||
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Rating: Highly recommended | |||||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 32,8 | 26,3 | |||||
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 | 35,3 | 26,6 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Points total | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 100 | ||||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 99.7 | ||||||
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 | 98.9 | ||||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | |||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good | 1- | 2+ | 2 | 3+ | |||
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Rating: Good | 2+ | 2 | 2 | 3+ | |||
Show test details |