Segment
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Premium2. Esa Tecar Supergrip Pro Lowcost
Comparison: Esa Tecar Supergrip Pro vs. Michelin ALPIN 6
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Esa) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (91%) than Esa (49%). In this particular case, the Michelin ALPIN 6 has a better rating of 67% compared to 49% of the Esa Tecar Supergrip Pro. The first tyre test of Esa Tecar Supergrip Pro was done in 2022, compared to 2019 when was the Michelin ALPIN 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2022 215/60 R16 test, where both the Tecar Supergrip Pro and the ALPIN 6 were tested.
| # | Esa Tecar Supergrip Pro
| Michelin ALPIN 6
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R20 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 4.35
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Exemplary2. Esa Tecar Supergrip Pro Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Good2. Esa Tecar Supergrip Pro Satisfactory
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow handling
Snow traction
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry driving behavior
Ice
(Overall rating)Ice braking
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Rolling resistance | Noise | Wear |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,8 | 1,4 | 1,8 | 1,5 | 2,7 | 1,5 |
| Esa Tecar Supergrip Pro Rating: Satisfactory | 3,0 | 3,1 | 1,9 | 2,0 | 2,8 | 3,0 | 2,0 |
| Michelin Alpin 6 Rating: Good | 2,4 | 2,0 | 2,4 | 1,9 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 2,0 |
| Show test details | |||||||
