Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium2. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (76%) than Yokohama (57%). The first tyre test of Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 was done in 2016, compared to 2017 when was the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the Ventus Prime3 K125 and the Advan Fleva V701 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 72% of Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 also have A wet ratings. We also know where Ventus Prime3 K125 is made - Hungary.
# | Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
| Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R15 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium2. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Upper-middle
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Exemplary2. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Satisfactory
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Conditionally recommended2. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Conditionally recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1- | 1- | 1 | ||||
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | 2 | ||||
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3+ | 2+ | 2 | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,1 | 34,6 | |||||
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 | 34,3 | 35,7 | |||||
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 | 34,9 | 40,2 | |||||
Show test details |