Table of contents:
215/60 R17 Nexen N Fera Primus variants
No
No
Special: 4PR, 4PR EV
Nexen N Fera Primus is a summer tyre made in total of 40 sizes, ranging from R15 to R15 - this particular dimension is R17, which means it fits to a 17 inch/431.8mm diameter wheel. 215/60 R17 is 30mm wider than the narrowest dimension (185) and 20mm narrower than the widest one (235). This tyre profile of 60 means the sidewall height of the tyre is 60% of the tyre width (215mm), which results in 129mm sidewall height. In 215/60 R17, there are 2 possible speed indexes for Nexen N Fera Primus - "H","V", which are good for speeds up to 210, 240 km/h.
215/60 R17 96 H 4PR
215/60 R17 96 H 4PR EV
Nexen N Fera Primus is made in 40 sizes, starting from 185/65 R15 up to 235/50 R19.
Similar tires
Nexen N Fera Primus in tyre tests
Relevant tyre tests in same or similiar dimension (215/60 R17)
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,7 | |||||
| Nexen N Fera Primus | 2,7 | 3,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
Autobild Summer tyre test 2022 215/55 R17
satisfactory
Ranked #17 of 21
The Nexen N Fera Primus secured a mid-range position, finishing 10th among 21 competitors. This performance highlighted its exceptional aquaplaning capabilities, specifically in longitudinal resistance, where it outperformed all others. It was praised for its excellent aquaplaning qualities, secure wet handling, and short braking distances on wet surfaces, all offered at an attractive price point. However, its journey wasn't without criticisms; the tire exhibited understeering on dry surfaces, a significantly reduced lifespan, and increased rolling resistance. This balanced set of strengths and weaknesses paints a comprehensive picture of its capabilities across different conditions.
satisfactory
Ranked #17 of 21
The Nexen N Fera Primus secured a mid-range position, finishing 10th among 21 competitors. This performance highlighted its exceptional aquaplaning capabilities, specifically in longitudinal resistance, where it outperformed all others. It was praised for its excellent aquaplaning qualities, secure wet handling, and short braking distances on wet surfaces, all offered at an attractive price point. However, its journey wasn't without criticisms; the tire exhibited understeering on dry surfaces, a significantly reduced lifespan, and increased rolling resistance. This balanced set of strengths and weaknesses paints a comprehensive picture of its capabilities across different conditions.
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1+ | ||||
| Nexen N Fera Primus | 2+ | 2- | 3 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Nexen N Fera Primus | 37,2 | 28,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
