• 14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: tyres similar to Fulda EcoControl HP2

Looking for a comparison of Fulda EcoControl HP2 to tyres that are made in similar dimensions? Here you can find detailed information based on tests, reviews and manufacturer's data.

# Fulda EcoControl HP2
/69%
Debica Presto HP2
/70%
Sava Intensa HP2
/65%
Nokian WetProof
/68%
Dunlop Sport BluResponse
/67%
Michelin e.Primacy
/71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
/66%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
/72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
/73%

Add to comparison

Fulda
Debica
Sava
Nokian
Dunlop
Michelin
BFGoodrich
Falken
Kumho
DimensionsR15 - R18 R15 - R17 R15 - R17 R14 - R20 R14 - R17 R15 - R21 R14 - R20 R14 - R22 R14 - R18
Price
Remove

The Fulda EcoControl HP2 and Debica Presto HP2 are both summer tyres, designed for optimal performance in warm weather. Tested and rated by tyre test experts, these tyres have shown noteworthy strengths and weaknesses in various categories.


The EcoControl HP2 is a successor to the Fulda EcoControl HP tyre. It has been enhanced to offer better performance with our rating standing at 79%. According to the Autobild test, the Fulda EcoControl HP2 excelled in exterior noise reduction and cross Aquaplaning, managing to secure the 20th position out of 53 tyres tested. However, the test summary from autobild 2024 suggests that it demonstrated a few areas of concern including weaknesses on wet surfaces.


The Debica Presto HP2, on the other hand, doesn't have any previous model and its rated at a slightly higher percentage of 84%. It scored better in the Autobild test achieving the 16th position out of 53 tyres examined. This tyre stood out in price/value category. Autobild 2024 test summary indicates that the Debica Presto HP2 had weak points in terms of driving safety.


When comparing the positions of both tyres in the ADAC test, the Fulda EcoControl HP2 secured the 13th out of 50, while Debica Presto HP2 secured the 15th position.


In conclusion, the Debica Presto HP2 outperforms the Fulda EcoControl HP2 in terms of price/value and our rating. However, the Fulda EcoControl HP2 proves to be quieter and better in combating Aquaplaning. For more detailed review and features of these tyres, visit the respective manufacturers' websites at Fulda and Debica.


Ultimately, the best tyre would depend on individual driving needs. Drivers who prioritize low noise and aquaplaning resistance would be more inclined towards the Fulda EcoControl HP2 whereas those who value efficiency and good return on investment might choose Debica Presto HP2.

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test35,425,8
Fulda EcoControl HP236,829,5
Debica Presto HP237,430,2
Sava Intensa HP237,230,0
Dunlop Sport BluResponse36,930,0
BFGoodrich Advantage37,429,1
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun36,528,0
Kumho Ecsta HS5235,4 26,1
Show test details
ADAC
Name Enviromental impactDriving safety
Best values in test1,31,8
Fulda EcoControl HP2
Rating: Good
2,22,8
Debica Presto HP2
Rating: Good
2,3
Sava Intensa HP2
Rating: Good
2,62,8
Nokian Wetproof
Rating: Good
2,92,0
Dunlop Sport BluResponse
Rating: Good
2,82,6
Michelin e.Primacy
Rating: Sufficient
1,3 3,9
BFGoodrich Advantage
Rating: Good
2,82,9
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Rating: Good
2,72,1
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Rating: Good
2,72,3
Show test details
Autobild
Name WetDryRunning costs
Best values in test1-2+1
Fulda EcoControl HP2
Rating: Satisfactory
2-22
Debica Presto HP2
Rating: Exemplary
222
Nokian WetProof
Rating: Satisfactory
223
Dunlop Sport BluResponse
Rating: Satisfactory
2-23+
BFGoodrich Advantage
Rating: Satisfactory
2-2+ 2-
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Rating: Satisfactory
2-22
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test34,129,6
Fulda EcoControl HP236,033,8
Debica Presto HP236,331,9
Sava Intensa HP236,433,7
Nokian Wetproof35,131,7
Dunlop Sport BluResponse35,432,2
BFGoodrich Advantage36,731,9
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun35,831,4
Show test details