Segment
2. Apollo Alnac 4G Winter Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (96%) than Apollo (57%). In this particular case, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 has a better rating of 98% compared to 65% of the Apollo Alnac 4G Winter. The first tyre test of Apollo Alnac 4G Winter was done in 2024, compared to 2020 when was the Continental WinterContact TS 870 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Alnac 4G Winter and the WinterContact TS 870 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Apollo Alnac 4G Winter
| Continental WinterContact TS 870
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R14 - R19 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Apollo Alnac 4G Winter Lowcost
1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Very good
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
Apollo Alnac 4G Winter Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2 | 2 | |||
Continental WinterContact TS 870 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2 | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
Apollo Alnac 4G Winter | 36.4 | 30.6 | |||||
Continental WinterContact TS 870 | 37.1 | 29.1 | |||||
Show test details |