Segment
1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Upper-middle2. Apollo Alnac 4G Winter Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Kleber). Kleber is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Kleber winter tyres are slightly better rated (69%) than Apollo (57%). In this particular case, the Kleber KRISALP HP3 has a better rating of 69% compared to 65% of the Apollo Alnac 4G Winter. The first tyre test of Apollo Alnac 4G Winter was done in 2024, compared to 2017 when was the Kleber KRISALP HP3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Alnac 4G Winter and the KRISALP HP3 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Apollo Alnac 4G Winter
| Kleber KRISALP HP3
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R14 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Upper-middle2. Apollo Alnac 4G Winter Lowcost
1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Exemplary
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
Apollo Alnac 4G Winter Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2 | 2 | |||
Kleber Krisalp HP3 Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2 | 2 | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
Apollo Alnac 4G Winter | 36.4 | 30.6 | |||||
Kleber Krisalp HP3 | 37.8 | 29.3 | |||||
Show test details |