Segment
1. Apollo Alnac 4G Lowcost2. DoubleCoin DC99 Lowcost
Comparison: Apollo Alnac 4G vs. DoubleCoin DC99
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (DoubleCoin). Generally, Apollo summer tyres are slightly better rated (47%) than DoubleCoin (1%). The first tyre test of Apollo Alnac 4G was done in 2015, compared to 2023 when was the DoubleCoin DC99 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the Alnac 4G and the DC99 were tested.
| # | Apollo Alnac 4G | DoubleCoin DC99 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Apollo Alnac 4G 18.882. DoubleCoin DC99 38.67
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Apollo Alnac 4G Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Apollo Alnac 4G Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Apollo Alnac 4G ? dB2. DoubleCoin DC99 ? dB
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Apollo Alnac 4G Rating: Good | 3,5 | 3,0 | |||||
| DoubleCoin DC99 Rating: Poor | 1,7 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||