14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Apollo Alnac 4G vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Costs
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear). Generally, GoodYear summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Apollo (29%). In this particular case, the GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 has a better rating of 78% compared to 23% of the Apollo Alnac 4G. The first tyre test of Apollo Alnac 4G was done in 2015, compared to 2025 when was the GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 first tested.

#	Apollo Alnac 4G /23%	GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 /78%

Dimensions	R14 - R17	R15 - R21
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

2. Apollo Alnac 4G Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Apollo Alnac 4G 32

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 17

Number of tests

1. Apollo Alnac 4G 8x

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

Best position in test

1. Apollo Alnac 4G 2.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

Worst position in test

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

2. Apollo Alnac 4G 30.

Average position in tests

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

2. Apollo Alnac 4G 18.88

Year of the last test

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

2. Apollo Alnac 4G 2023

Best rating in test

1. Apollo Alnac 4G Exemplary

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Very good

Worst rating in test

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Recommended

2. Apollo Alnac 4G Satisfactory

Wet

(Overall rating)

Apollo
Alnac 4G

75%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

2. Apollo Alnac 4G 69%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Apollo Alnac 4G 80%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

Wet braking

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

2. Apollo Alnac 4G 69%

Wet handling

1. Apollo Alnac 4G 73%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

Wet circle cornering

1. Apollo Alnac 4G 83%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

2. Apollo Alnac 4G ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Apollo
Alnac 4G

68%

Dry braking

1. Apollo Alnac 4G 77%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

Dry driving behavior

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 65%

2. Apollo Alnac 4G 63%

Dry handling

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

2. Apollo Alnac 4G 70%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Apollo
Alnac 4G

82%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Exterior noise

1. Apollo Alnac 4G 82%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

Interior noise

1. Apollo Alnac 4G 81%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 73%

Comfort

1. Apollo Alnac 4G 87%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 59%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Apollo Alnac 4G ?

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Apollo
Alnac 4G

71%

Mileage

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

2. Apollo Alnac 4G 65%

Fuel efficiency

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 94%

2. Apollo Alnac 4G 87%

Rolling resistance

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72%

2. Apollo Alnac 4G 61%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

2. Apollo Alnac 4G ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Comparison: Apollo Alnac 4G vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands