Segment
1. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle2. Apollo Apterra Winter Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Apollo (57%). But when it comes to comparing Apollo Apterra Winter and Nokian WR D4, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Apollo Apterra Winter was done in 2017, compared to 2015 when was the Nokian WR D4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2017 215/65 R16 test, where both the Apterra Winter and the WR D4 were tested.
# | Apollo Apterra Winter
| Nokian WR D4
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R20 | ||
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle2. Apollo Apterra Winter Lowcost
2. Nokian WR D4 14.
1. Nokian WR D4 6.04
1. Nokian WR D4 Highly recommended2. Apollo Apterra Winter Satisfactory
1. Nokian WR D4 Recommended2. Apollo Apterra Winter Satisfactory
1. Nokian WR D4 91%
1. Nokian WR D4 89%
1. Nokian WR D4 91%
1. Nokian WR D4 81%
2. Nokian WR D4 72%
1. Nokian WR D4 69%
1. Nokian WR D4 69%
1. Nokian WR D4 86%
2. Nokian WR D4 67%
1. Nokian WR D4 85%
2. Nokian WR D4 82%
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,1 | 2,0 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 |
Apollo Apterra Winter Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 2,5 | 3,8 | 2,0 | 2,7 |
Nokian WR D4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 2,5 | 1,9 | 2,5 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 2,0 |
Show test details |