Segment
1. Apollo Apterra Winter Lowcost2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Apollo Apterra Winter vs. Sava Eskimo HP2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Sava winter tyres are slightly better rated (62%) than Apollo (57%). Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2017 215/65 R16 test, where both the Apterra Winter and the Eskimo HP2 were tested.
| # | Apollo Apterra Winter
| Sava Eskimo HP2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R18 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Sava Eskimo HP2 14.93
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory2. Apollo Apterra Winter Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory2. Apollo Apterra Winter Satisfactory
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow handling
Snow traction
Snow braking
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry driving behavior
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel efficiency
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Ice braking
Ice lateral guidance
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,1 | 2,0 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 |
| Apollo Apterra Winter Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 2,5 | 3,8 | 2,0 | 2,7 |
| Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,4 | 2,5 | 2,3 | 3,6 | 1,5 | 1,7 |
| Show test details | |||||||
