Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Upper-middle2. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Czech Republic (Barum) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Barum is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Barum winter tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Kumho (61%). The first tyre test of Barum Polaris 5 was done in 2019, compared to 2015 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP51 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2021 195/65 R15 test, where both the Polaris 5 and the WinterCraft WP51 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Barum Polaris 5 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (96%) of the Kumho WinterCraft WP51 also have C wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Polaris 5 is made in Czech Republic and WinterCraft WP51 is made in Korea.
# | Barum Polaris 5
| Kumho WinterCraft WP51
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R19 | R13 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Upper-middle2. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost
1. Barum Polaris 5 15.15
1. Barum Polaris 5 Good2. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Satisfactory
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Sufficient2. Barum Polaris 5 Sufficient
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,9 | 1,9 | 2,0 | 2,6 | 2,0 | |
Barum Polaris 5 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,2 | 3,0 | 2,0 | 2,0 | 2,8 | 3,0 | |
Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Rating: Sufficient | 3,0 | 3,6 | 2,5 | 2,4 | 2,7 | 3,0 | |
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,1 | 27,3 | |||||
Barum Polaris 5 | 36,1 | 28,8 | |||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP51 | 37,8 | 29,8 | |||||
Show test details |