Segment
1. BF Goodrich g-Grip Upper-middle2. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 Upper-middle
Comparison: BF Goodrich g-Grip vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP3
Table of contents:
| # | BF Goodrich g-Grip
| Kleber Dynaxer HP3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R15 | R14 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
When it comes to summer tyres, the choices can seem limitless. Today we're comparing two renowned tyre models, the BF Goodrich g-Grip and the Kleber Dynaxer HP3. Both bring different strengths and weaknesses to the table, and we're here to dissect them for you.
The BF Goodrich g-Grip earns a rating of 28% from us, while the Kleber Dynaxer HP3 somewhat surpasses it with an earned 41%. Thus, the latter offers an initial impression of greater satisfaction.
In the comprehensive Autobild test which ranked 50 tyres, the BF Goodrich g-grip stood at the 18th position, while the Dynaxer HP3 trailed close behind at the 19th. Despite the Kleber Dynaxer HP3's slightly lower positioning, it outshined its competitor in certain aspects, notably showing great strength in the 'Wet circle cornering' test. No explicit replacement model for either tyre is indicated in our data at this time.
Diving deeper, the tyres have unique properties. The BF Goodrich g-Grip's hardy design is an asset in tread life and resistance to wear. However, it lacks somewhat in areas of wet braking and road feedback. This, along with its 18th ranking in the Autobild test, adds a few cons to this model's performance.
On the other hand, the Kleber Dynaxer HP3 has shown exceptional wet-grip and cornering performance. The HP3 excels especially in the 'wet circle' cornering test, outperforming many of its rivals, including the g-Grip. One of its potential flaws is that it may not be quite as long-lasting as some competitors, like the g-Grip.
In conclusion, the BF Goodrich g-Grip and the Kleber Dynaxer HP3 have their unique advantages and weaknesses. If you prioritise wet-grip performance and the ability to perform in challenging conditions, the HP3 may better meet your needs. If your priorities lie in durability and long tread life, the BF Goodrich g-Grip could be the tyre for you. Keep in mind it's essential to consider these aspects and base the final decision on what most suits your driving routine and habits.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. BF Goodrich g-Grip 19.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 Satisfactory2. BF Goodrich g-Grip Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 Satisfactory2. BF Goodrich g-Grip Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| BF Goodrich g-Grip Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2- | 1- | ||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP3 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2- | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
| BF Goodrich g-Grip | 38,3 | 39,1 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP3 | 39,2 | 37,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 34,6 | |||||
| BF Goodrich g-Grip | 36,2 | 41,8 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP3 | 37,7 | 44,69 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,6 | 27 | |||||
| BF Goodrich g-Grip | 37,8 | 30,3 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP3 | 37,7 | 31,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
