Segment
1. BFGoodrich Advantage Upper-middle2. Fulda EcoControl HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Fulda EcoControl HP2
Table of contents:
| # | BFGoodrich Advantage
| Fulda EcoControl HP2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R15 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
We all know the importance of good tyres for optimal safety, performance, and fuel efficiency. Today, let's delve into a comparison between two summer tyres - the BFGoodrich Advantage and the Fulda EcoControl HP2. Brought to you by manufacturers BFGoodrich and Fulda respectively.
The BFGoodrich Advantage scored a 76% rating on our website. Autobild tests positioned this tyre 18th out of 53, crediting it for its comfort and dry handling. ADAC gave it recognition for fuel efficiency, ranking it 9th out of 15. Autobild 2024 praised its dynamic dry handling, quiet rolling noise, and low rolling resistance, all available at a competitive price. However, they noted a tendency for understeering on wet surfaces as a minor drawback.
On the other hand, the Fulda EcoControl HP2, which replaced the previous Fulda EcoControl HP model, achieved a 79% rating on our portal. Its test position was quite similar to that of the BFGoodrich Advantage, ranking 20th in Autobild and 8th in the ADAC tests. This tyre made its mark with low exterior noise levels and good performance against cross aquaplaning. Critics at Autobild 2024 applauded it for its strong environmental credentials and satisfactory tire tread wear and efficiency, but marked it down for less balanced performance and weakness on wet tracks.
So, which tyre is better overall? Both score fairly close to each other, both in our ratings and in various independent tests. The BFGoodrich Advantage stands out for its superior dry handling, quiet operation, and cost-effectiveness, but loses points for wet surface handling. On the contrary, the Fulda EcoControl HP2 is a strong performer in aquaplaning tests and stands out for its lower noise generation, albeit with noted weaknesses under wet conditions.
In conclusion, deciding between the BFGoodrich Advantage and the Fulda EcoControl HP2 might boil down to your individual driving conditions and preferences. If you often drive in dry conditions and prioritize comfort and handling, BFGoodrich could be your choice. However, if you want to prioritize efficiency and score environmental points, the Fulda EcoControl HP2 could make the cut despite its slight disadvantage on wet roads.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Fulda EcoControl HP2 12.752. BFGoodrich Advantage 13.62
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda EcoControl HP2 Satisfactory2. BFGoodrich Advantage Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Fulda EcoControl HP2 70 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BFGoodrich Advantage Rating: Good | |||||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| BFGoodrich Advantage | 37,4 | 29,1 | |||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 | 36,8 | 29,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| BFGoodrich Advantage Rating: Good | 2,8 | 2,9 | |||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 Rating: Good | 2,2 | 2,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,7 | 1,6 | 2,7 | 1 | 1,7 | ||
| BFGoodrich Advantage Rating: Satisfactory | 3,0 | 2,9 | 3,2 | 2,5 | 2,1 | ||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 2,7 | 3,2 | 1,0 | 2,2 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1 | ||||
| BFGoodrich Advantage Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2+ | 2- | ||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| BFGoodrich Advantage | 36,7 | 31,9 | |||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 | 36,0 | 33,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 1,4 | 2,7 | 0,6 | |||
| BFGoodrich Advantage Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 2,2 | 2,8 | 2,0 | |||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 2,5 | 2,7 | 1,5 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
