Segment
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV Upper-middle2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Upper-middle
Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from USA. BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Uniroyal is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Uniroyal (69%). But when it comes to comparing BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV and Uniroyal MS plus 77, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV was done in 2017, compared to 2015 when was the Uniroyal MS plus 77 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2017 215/65 R16 test, where both the G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV and the MS plus 77 were tested.
| # | BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV
| Uniroyal MS plus 77
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R20 | R13 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.21
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,1 | 2,0 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 |
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 2,6 | 1,9 | 2,5 | 3,2 | 1,5 | 1,5 |
| Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,4 | 3,2 | 2,1 | 2,8 | 3,2 | 2,0 | 2,5 |
| Show test details | |||||||
