8 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Firestone Winterhawk 4

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from USA. BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Firestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (72%) than BFGoodrich (54%). In this particular case, the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has a better rating of 87% compared to 84% of the Firestone Winterhawk 4. The first tyre test of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 was done in 2017, compared to 2020 when was the Firestone Winterhawk 4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the G-FORCE WINTER 2 and the Winterhawk 4 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 88% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Firestone Winterhawk 4 also have B wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the G-FORCE WINTER 2 is made in Romania/Poland and Winterhawk 4 is made in Italy.

#	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /87%	Firestone Winterhawk 4 /84%

Dimensions	R14 - R19	R14 - R20
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

2. Firestone Winterhawk 4 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Firestone Winterhawk 4 97

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

Number of tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 16x

2. Firestone Winterhawk 4 9x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Firestone Winterhawk 4 5.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 11.

2. Firestone Winterhawk 4 16.

Average position in tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 5.63

2. Firestone Winterhawk 4 9.22

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2022

2. Firestone Winterhawk 4 2022

Best rating in test

1. Firestone Winterhawk 4 Highly recommended

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

Worst rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

2. Firestone Winterhawk 4 Satisfactory

Wet

(Overall rating)

Firestone
Winterhawk 4
77%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
70.3%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 74%

2. Firestone Winterhawk 4 69%

Wet braking

1. Firestone Winterhawk 4 80%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

Wet handling

1. Firestone Winterhawk 4 82%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 85%

2. Firestone Winterhawk 4 79%

Wet circle cornering

1. Firestone Winterhawk 4 81%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 66%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Firestone Winterhawk 4 ?

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Firestone
Winterhawk 4
72.9%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
71.9%

Dry braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

2. Firestone Winterhawk 4 70%

Dry handling

1. Firestone Winterhawk 4 72%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

Dry lane changing

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

2. Firestone Winterhawk 4 60%

Dry steering response

1. Firestone Winterhawk 4 89%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 78%

Dry driving behavior

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

2. Firestone Winterhawk 4 55%

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
93.7%

Firestone
Winterhawk 4
86.8%

Snow handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

2. Firestone Winterhawk 4 89%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

2. Firestone Winterhawk 4 85%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Firestone Winterhawk 4 84%

Snow cornering

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

2. Firestone Winterhawk 4 84%

Lateral guidance on snow

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 100%

2. Firestone Winterhawk 4 97%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Firestone
Winterhawk 4
78.8%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
77.5%

Rolling resistance

1. Firestone Winterhawk 4 74%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

Mileage

1. Firestone Winterhawk 4 84%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 76%

Price/value

1. Firestone Winterhawk 4 79%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Firestone Winterhawk 4 ?

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Firestone
Winterhawk 4
83.3%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
82.9%

Exterior noise

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 86%

2. Firestone Winterhawk 4 85%

Comfort

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 79%

2. Firestone Winterhawk 4 68%

Interior noise

1. Firestone Winterhawk 4 82%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69 dB

2. Firestone Winterhawk 4 ? dB

Ice

(Overall rating)

Firestone
Winterhawk 4
82.8%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
80.5%

Ice braking

1. Firestone Winterhawk 4 86%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 80%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,8	25,4
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,8	25,4
Firestone Winterhawk 4	36	26,4
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	2+	2+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2-	2	1-	2
Firestone Winterhawk 4 Rating: Satisfactory	2	3+	2+	2+
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2022 185/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Rolling resistance	Noise	Wear
Best values in test	1,7	1,9	1,8	1,9	1,7	2,5	1,5
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2,7	2,6	2,0	2,5	2,4	2,7	2,0
Firestone Winterhawk 4 Rating: Satisfactory	2,0	3,2	2,2	2,1	1,7	2,8	2,5
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Wear
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	1-	1
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2	3+	1-	3+	2
Firestone Winterhawk 4 Rating: Satisfactory	2+	3+	1-	2+	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,1	27,3
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,6	27,9
Firestone Winterhawk 4	33,5	28,6
Show test details

Használtautó.hu Winter tyre test 2020 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on ice
Best values in test	13,9	14,8	16,4
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	15,1	15,9	23,3
Firestone Winterhawk 4	14,4	15,9	25,3
Show test details

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Firestone Winterhawk 4

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands