14 shops, 56 847 products

|

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Nokian WR D4

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Nokian (61%). The first tyre test of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 was done in 2017, compared to 2015 when was the Nokian WR D4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the G-FORCE WINTER 2 and the WR D4 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (97%) of the Nokian WR D4 also have B wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the G-FORCE WINTER 2 is made in Romania/Poland and WR D4 is made in Finland.

#	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /84%	Nokian WR D4 /0%	Add to comparison Make Model New comparison

Dimensions	R14 - R19	R13 - R20
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

2. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

2. Nokian WR D4 82

Number of tests

1. Nokian WR D4 26x

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 21x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Nokian WR D4 2.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Nokian WR D4 14.

Average position in tests

1. Nokian WR D4 6.04

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.19

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2023

2. Nokian WR D4 2018

Best rating in test

1. Nokian WR D4 Highly recommended

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

Worst rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

2. Nokian WR D4 Recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Nokian
WR D4

71.4%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

70.5%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Nokian WR D4 B

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

Dry

(Overall rating)

Nokian
WR D4

79.9%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71.9%

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

92.8%

Nokian
WR D4

91.7%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

79.6%

Nokian
WR D4

71%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

2. Nokian WR D4 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Nokian
WR D4

86.8%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

75.2%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Nokian WR D4 C

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Ice

(Overall rating)

Nokian
WR D4

83.3%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80.5%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2	2-	1	2
Nokian WR D4 Rating: Satisfactory	2	2-	2	3+
Show test details

Autobild

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,1	25,9
Nokian WR D4	35	27,7
Show test details