Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Nokian WR Snowproof

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (67%) than Nokian (52%). In this particular case, the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has a better rating of 89% compared to 57% of the Nokian WR Snowproof. The first tyre test of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 was done in 2017, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian WR Snowproof first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 205/55 R16 test, where both the G-FORCE WINTER 2 and the WR Snowproof were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 88% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (86%) of the Nokian WR Snowproof also have B wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the G-FORCE WINTER 2 is made in Romania/Poland and WR Snowproof is made in Finland/Russian Federation.

#	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /89%	Nokian WR Snowproof /57%	Add to comparison Make Model New comparison

Dimensions	R14 - R19	R14 - R20
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

/89%

Nokian WR Snowproof

/57%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

New comparison

Dimensions

R14 - R19

R14 - R20

Price

Set dimension to see prices

Remove

Remove from comparison

Segment

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

2. Nokian WR Snowproof Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

2. Nokian WR Snowproof 58

Number of tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 19x

2. Nokian WR Snowproof 14x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Nokian WR Snowproof 5.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 11.

2. Nokian WR Snowproof 20.

Average position in tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 5.63

2. Nokian WR Snowproof 11.07

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2023

2. Nokian WR Snowproof 2023

Best rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

2. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

2. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory

Wet

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%

Nokian
WR Snowproof
68%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 83%

2. Nokian WR Snowproof 77%

Wet braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 71%

2. Nokian WR Snowproof 66%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Nokian WR Snowproof 65%

Wet handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 77%

2. Nokian WR Snowproof 66%

Wet circle cornering

1. Nokian WR Snowproof 73%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Nokian WR Snowproof ?

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Nokian
WR Snowproof
74%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
71%

Dry braking

1. Nokian WR Snowproof 84%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 75%

Dry handling

1. Nokian WR Snowproof 81%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 64%

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
94%

Nokian
WR Snowproof
69%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 89%

2. Nokian WR Snowproof 70%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 96%

2. Nokian WR Snowproof 73%

Snow handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Nokian WR Snowproof 71%

Snow cornering

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

2. Nokian WR Snowproof 61%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
84%

Nokian
WR Snowproof
76%

Exterior noise

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

2. Nokian WR Snowproof 79%

Comfort

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 77%

2. Nokian WR Snowproof 77%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69 dB

2. Nokian WR Snowproof 69 dB

Costs

(Overall rating)

Nokian
WR Snowproof
80%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%

Rolling resistance

1. Nokian WR Snowproof 96%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 76%

Mileage

1. Nokian WR Snowproof 76%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 75%

Price/value

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 76%

2. Nokian WR Snowproof 69%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

2. Nokian WR Snowproof ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
69.5%

Nokian
WR Snowproof
67%

Add to comparison

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Wear
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	1-	1
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2	3+	1-	3+	2
Nokian WR Snowproof Rating: Satisfactory	3	2	2-	1-	2+
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2021 195/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear
Best values in test	1,6	1,9	1,9	2,0	2,6	2,0
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2,6	2,2	1,9	2,5	3,3	2,0
Nokian WR Snowproof Rating: Satisfactory	3,3	2,5	2,3	2,2	2,9	2,5
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,1	27,3
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,6	27,9
Nokian WR Snowproof	36,5	29,2
Show test details

ACE Winter tyre test 2020 225/50 R17

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	200	67	48	60	18	9
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Recommended	194	63	42	60	14	9
Nokian WR Snowproof Rating: Recommended	179	56	45	47	18	7
Show test details

AutoMotorSport Winter tyre test 2020 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	9,5	8,7	9,9	10	9
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Very good	7,0	7,3	9,9	10	8
Nokian WR Snowproof Rating: Good	6,4	8,1	6,3	10	7
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	1-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2+	2-	1-	2
Nokian WR Snowproof Rating: Good	2-	2-	2+	2-
Show test details

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Nokian WR Snowproof

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands