• 10 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Nokian WR Snowproof P

Table of contents:

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (67%) than Nokian (52%). In this particular case, the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has a better rating of 89% compared to 50% of the Nokian WR Snowproof P. The first tyre test of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 was done in 2017, compared to 2021 when was the Nokian WR Snowproof P first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the G-FORCE WINTER 2 and the WR Snowproof P were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 88% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian WR Snowproof P also have B wet ratings. We also know where G-FORCE WINTER 2 is made - Romania/Poland.

# BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
/89%
 		Nokian WR Snowproof P
/50%

Add to comparison

New comparison
DimensionsR14 - R19 R17 - R21
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test32,825,4
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 235,825,4
Nokian WR Snowproof P3626,2
Show test details
Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17
Name WetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in test2+2+2+2+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
Rating: Good		2-21-2
Nokian WR Snowproof P
Rating: Satisfactory		3+22-2
Show test details