14 shops, 56 847 products

|

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Nokian WR Snowproof P

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Nokian (61%). In this particular case, the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has a better rating of 84% compared to 62% of the Nokian WR Snowproof P. The first tyre test of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 was done in 2017, compared to 2021 when was the Nokian WR Snowproof P first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the G-FORCE WINTER 2 and the WR Snowproof P were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian WR Snowproof P also have B wet ratings. We also know where G-FORCE WINTER 2 is made - Romania/Poland.

#	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /84%	Nokian WR Snowproof P /62%	Add to comparison Make Model New comparison

Dimensions	R14 - R19	R17 - R21
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

2. Nokian WR Snowproof P 55

Number of tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 21x

2. Nokian WR Snowproof P 6x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Nokian WR Snowproof P 4.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Nokian WR Snowproof P 18.

Average position in tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.19

2. Nokian WR Snowproof P 10

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2023

2. Nokian WR Snowproof P 2022

Best rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory

Wet

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71%

Nokian
WR Snowproof P

58%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

2. Nokian WR Snowproof P B

Dry

(Overall rating)

Nokian
WR Snowproof P

83%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

70%

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

86%

Nokian
WR Snowproof P

64%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

85%

Nokian
WR Snowproof P

76%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 70 dB

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Nokian
WR Snowproof P

72%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

62%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Nokian WR Snowproof P C

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Ice

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80.5%

Nokian
WR Snowproof P

0%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,8	25,4
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,8	25,4
Nokian WR Snowproof P	36	26,2
Show test details

Autobild

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	2+	2+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2-	2	1-	2
Nokian WR Snowproof P Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2	2-	2
Show test details