Comparison: Bridgestone Alenza 001 SUV vs. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (86%) than Hankook (76%). But when it comes to comparing Bridgestone Alenza 001 SUV and Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452, the rating is the same - 0%. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Bridgestone Alenza 001 SUV has B wet grip rating, whereas 90% of Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 has C rating.
| # | Bridgestone Alenza 001 SUV
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R19 - R19 | R13 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Satisfactory
