14 shops, 56 847 products

|

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Falken Eurowinter HS449

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Japan. Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (93%) than Falken (58%). But when it comes to comparing Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 and Falken Eurowinter HS449, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the Blizzak LM-001 and the Eurowinter HS449 were tested. See more mutual tests below. We also know where Blizzak LM-001 is made - Poland.

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 /0%	Falken Eurowinter HS449 /0%	Add to comparison Make Model New comparison

Dimensions	R14 - R21	R14 - R21
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium

2. Falken Eurowinter HS449 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

2. Falken Eurowinter HS449 53

Number of tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

2. Falken Eurowinter HS449 6x

Best position in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

2. Falken Eurowinter HS449 7.

Worst position in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

2. Falken Eurowinter HS449 21.

Average position in tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

2. Falken Eurowinter HS449 13.17

Year of the last test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

2. Falken Eurowinter HS449 2017

Best rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

2. Falken Eurowinter HS449 Conditionally recommended

Worst rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

2. Falken Eurowinter HS449 Conditionally recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78.6%

Falken
Eurowinter HS449

?

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 B

2. Falken Eurowinter HS449 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

81.7%

Falken
Eurowinter HS449

?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

76.6%

Falken
Eurowinter HS449

?

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 C

2. Falken Eurowinter HS449 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

77.4%

Falken
Eurowinter HS449

?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

49.6%

Falken
Eurowinter HS449

?

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 71 dB

2. Falken Eurowinter HS449 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

80%

Falken
Eurowinter HS449

?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	32,5	28,7
Falken Eurowinter HS449	36,1	29,1
Show test details

Autobild

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2	2+	1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: -	2	3+	2+	1-
Falken Eurowinter HS449 Rating: -	2-	3+	2-	2
Show test details

Autobild

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,2	25
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	38,5	25,9
Falken Eurowinter HS449	38,3	26,9
Show test details

Autobild

Autobild Winter tyre test 2015 185/60 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1	2+	1	1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: -	2-	2-	2+	1-
Falken Eurowinter HS449 Rating: -	2	2	2+	3
Show test details

Autobild

Autobild Winter tyre test 2015 185/60 R15

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	36,8	27,7
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	43,4	28,1
Falken Eurowinter HS449	40,6	28,2
Show test details