Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle
Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Kumho (38%). The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 was done in 2015, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 71% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (95%) of the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 also have B wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Blizzak LM-001 is made in Poland and WinterCraft WP52 is made in Korea.
| # | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R21 | R13 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient
