Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Apollo Alnac 4G

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo). Generally, Apollo winter tyres are slightly better rated (68%) than Bridgestone (46%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has a better rating of 92% compared to 56% of the Apollo Alnac 4G. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 was done in 2019, compared to 2015 when was the Apollo Alnac 4G first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 205/55 R16 test, where both the Blizzak LM-005 and the Alnac 4G were tested. We also know where Blizzak LM-005 is made - Italy/Hungary/Poland.

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 /92%	Apollo Alnac 4G /56%	Add to comparison Make Model New comparison

Dimensions	R14 - R22	R14 - R17
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

/92%

Apollo Alnac 4G

/56%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

New comparison

Dimensions

R14 - R22

R14 - R17

Price

Set dimension to see prices

Remove

Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium

2. Apollo Alnac 4G Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

2. Apollo Alnac 4G 32

Number of tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 47x

2. Apollo Alnac 4G 8x

Best position in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

2. Apollo Alnac 4G 2.

Worst position in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

2. Apollo Alnac 4G 30.

Average position in tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.21

2. Apollo Alnac 4G 18.88

Year of the last test

1. Apollo Alnac 4G 2023

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2023

Best rating in test

1. Apollo Alnac 4G Exemplary

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good

Worst rating in test

1. Apollo Alnac 4G Satisfactory

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended

Snow

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
83%

Apollo
Alnac 4G
?

Snow braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

2. Apollo Alnac 4G ?

Snow traction

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 81%

2. Apollo Alnac 4G ?

Snow handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 76%

2. Apollo Alnac 4G ?

Snow cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 77%

2. Apollo Alnac 4G ?

Snow acceleration

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 94%

2. Apollo Alnac 4G ?

Lateral guidance on snow

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 76%

2. Apollo Alnac 4G ?

Wet

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
89%

Apollo
Alnac 4G
78%

Wet braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 91%

2. Apollo Alnac 4G 72%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

2. Apollo Alnac 4G 79%

Wet handling

1. Apollo Alnac 4G 93%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 91%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 81%

2. Apollo Alnac 4G 71%

Wet circle cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 88%

2. Apollo Alnac 4G 76%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

2. Apollo Alnac 4G ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
79%

Apollo
Alnac 4G
79%

Dry braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

2. Apollo Alnac 4G 73%

Dry handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

2. Apollo Alnac 4G 70%

Dry steering response

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

2. Apollo Alnac 4G ?

Dry lane changing

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 80%

2. Apollo Alnac 4G ?

Dry driving behavior

1. Apollo Alnac 4G 87%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 68%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
83%

Apollo
Alnac 4G
78%

Exterior noise

1. Apollo Alnac 4G 84%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 81%

Comfort

1. Apollo Alnac 4G 87%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 85%

Interior noise

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

2. Apollo Alnac 4G 69%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ? dB

2. Apollo Alnac 4G ? dB

Costs

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
68%

Apollo
Alnac 4G
64%

Rolling resistance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 87%

2. Apollo Alnac 4G 61%

Mileage

1. Apollo Alnac 4G 69%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 66%

Price/value

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 60%

2. Apollo Alnac 4G ?

Fuel efficiency

1. Apollo Alnac 4G 63%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 61%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Apollo Alnac 4G ?

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
70%

Apollo
Alnac 4G
?

Ice braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 72%

2. Apollo Alnac 4G ?

Ice lateral guidance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 69%

2. Apollo Alnac 4G ?

Add to comparison

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,1	27,3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	32,1	28,1
Apollo Alnac 4G	38	29,5
Show test details

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Apollo Alnac 4G

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands