Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 SUV Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Dunlop). Dunlop is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (93%) than Dunlop (71%). The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 was done in 2019, compared to 2016 when was the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 SUV first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2020 235/55 R17 test, where both the Blizzak LM-005 and the Winter Sport 5 SUV were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 95% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has A wet grip rating, whereas 53% of Dunlop Winter Sport 5 SUV has B rating. We also know where Blizzak LM-005 is made - Italy/Hungary/Poland.
# | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
| Dunlop Winter Sport 5 SUV
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R22 | R16 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 SUV Premium
1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 SUV Highly recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good
1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 SUV Recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,5 | 1,9 | 1,8 | 2,3 | 2,6 | 0,8 | 1,8 |
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory | 1,5 | 3,0 | 2,2 | 2,4 | 3,0 | 2,0 | 1,8 |
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 SUV Rating: Satisfactory | 2,5 | 2,2 | 2,8 | 2,5 | 3,3 | 1,5 | 2,2 |
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2 | 1 | ||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good | 2+ | 2 | 1 | ||||
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 SUV Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2+ | ||||
Show test details |