Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Minerva Ice-Plus S210 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Minerva). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (93%) than Minerva (0%). The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 was done in 2019, compared to 2016 when was the Minerva Ice-Plus S210 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 225/45 R18 test, where both the Blizzak LM-005 and the Ice-Plus S210 were tested. See more mutual tests below. We also know where Blizzak LM-005 is made - Italy/Hungary/Poland.
# | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
| Minerva Ice-Plus S210
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R22 | ||
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Minerva Ice-Plus S210 Lowcost
2. Minerva Ice-Plus S210 35.33
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 31,4 | 30,9 | |||||
Minerva Ice-Plus S210 | 41,9 | - | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | ||||
Minerva Ice-Plus S210 Rating: Not recommended | 4- | 2 | 4- | ||||
Show test details |