Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Nokian WR SUV 3 Upper-middle
Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Nokian WR SUV 3
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Bridgestone (46%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has a better rating of 92% compared to 24% of the Nokian WR SUV 3. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 was done in 2019, compared to 2015 when was the Nokian WR SUV 3 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 98% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has A wet grip rating, whereas 80% of Nokian WR SUV 3 has C rating. We also know where Blizzak LM-005 is made - Italy/Hungary/Poland.
| # | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | Nokian WR SUV 3 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R22 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Nokian WR SUV 3 4.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 Highly recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good
Worst rating in test
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow traction
Snow handling
Snow cornering
Snow acceleration
Lateral guidance on snow
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 100%
Dry steering response
Dry lane changing
Dry driving behavior
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
2. Nokian WR SUV 3 ? dB