8 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Japan. Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (76%) than Yokohama (62%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has a better rating of 90% compared to 62% of the Yokohama BluEarth winter V905. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the Blizzak LM-005 and the BluEarth winter V905 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 98% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has A wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 has C rating. We also know where Blizzak LM-005 is made - Italy/Hungary/Poland.

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 /90%	Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 /62%

Dimensions	R14 - R22	R15 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 140

Number of tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 35x

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 4x

Best position in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 11.

Worst position in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 7.

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 21.

Average position in tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2.77

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 16.75

Year of the last test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2022

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 2020

Best rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Good

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory

Wet

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
89.4%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905
79.6%

Wet braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 95%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 84%

Wet handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 93%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 79%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 72%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 80%

Wet circle cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 88%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 79%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
84.6%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905
83.9%

Dry braking

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 88%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 81%

Dry handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 87%

Dry lane changing

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 ?

Dry steering response

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 87%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 ?

Dry driving behavior

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 64%

Snow

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
80.4%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905
70.5%

Snow braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 88%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 71%

Snow traction

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 68%

Snow handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 71%

Snow cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 80%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 71%

Snow acceleration

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 94%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 ?

Lateral guidance on snow

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 76%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905
79.1%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
70.6%

Rolling resistance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 87%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 79%

Price/value

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 76%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 60%

Mileage

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 76%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 66%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 ?

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
89.6%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905
72.2%

Exterior noise

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 81%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 80%

Comfort

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 92%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

Interior noise

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 95%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 67%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 72 dB

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ? dB

Ice

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905
80.7%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
75.5%

Ice braking

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 83%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 76%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	30,3	24,3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	30,3	24,5
Yokohama BluEarth winter V905	35,4	26,1
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	29,2	24
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	29,2	24,6
Yokohama BluEarth winter V905	32,5	26
Show test details

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands