Comparison: Bridgestone Duravis All Season vs. Rotalla Setula Van 4 Season RA05
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Rotalla). Generally, Rotalla allround tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Bridgestone (60%). In this particular case, the Rotalla Setula Van 4 Season RA05 has a better rating of 63% compared to 31% of the Bridgestone Duravis All Season. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 225/75 R16 test, where both the Duravis All Season and the Setula Van 4 Season RA05 were tested.
| # | Bridgestone Duravis All Season
| Rotalla Setula Van 4 Season RA05
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R17 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Bridgestone Duravis All Season Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Bridgestone Duravis All Season Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bridgestone Duravis All Season Rating: Conditionally recommended | |||||||
| Rotalla Setula Van 4 Season RA05 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
