Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium2. Hankook Kinergy eco2 K435 Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (59%) than Bridgestone (57%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Turanza T005 has a better rating of 89% compared to 56% of the Hankook Kinergy eco2 K435. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Turanza T005 was done in 2018, compared to 2019 when was the Hankook Kinergy eco2 K435 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Firmenauto 2021 195/55 R16 test, where both the Turanza T005 and the Kinergy eco2 K435 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 82% of Bridgestone Turanza T005 has A wet grip rating, whereas 64% of Hankook Kinergy eco2 K435 has B rating. We also know where Turanza T005 is made - Hungary/Poland/France/Italy.
# | Bridgestone Turanza T005 | Hankook Kinergy eco2 K435 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R14 - R22 | R13 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium2. Hankook Kinergy eco2 K435 Premium
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Exemplary2. Hankook Kinergy eco2 K435 Satisfactory
2. Hankook Kinergy eco2 K435 Satisfactory
Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 8,9 | 8,9 | 8,7 | 10 | 10 | ||
Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Good | 8,1 | 8,1 | 8,0 | 10 | 6 | ||
Hankook Kinergy eco2 K435 Rating: Satisfactory | 7,7 | 6,9 | 7,4 | 10 | 10 | ||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,5 | 2,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 | ||
Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Good | 1,9 | 1,5 | 2,9 | 2,0 | 2,3 | ||
Hankook Kinergy eco2 K435 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,4 | 2,4 | 2,4 | 2,5 | 1,7 | ||
Show test details |