Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium2. Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (86%) than Kumho (56%). The first tyre test of Bridgestone Turanza T005 was done in 2018, compared to 2016 when was the Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 185/65 R15 test, where both the Turanza T005 and the EcowinG ES01 KH27 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 76% of Bridgestone Turanza T005 has A wet grip rating, whereas 78% of Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 has C rating. We also know where Turanza T005 is made - Hungary/Poland/France/Italy.
# | Bridgestone Turanza T005
| Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R22 | R14 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium2. Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 Upper-middle
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Exemplary
Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,5 | 2,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 | ||
Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Good | 1,9 | 1,5 | 2,9 | 2,0 | 2,3 | ||
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 2,8 | 2,8 | 2,0 | 2,0 | ||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
Bridgestone Turanza T005 | 35,7 | 34,3 | |||||
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 | 38,3 | 40,4 | |||||
Show test details |