Segment
2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Premium
Comparison: Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO vs. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook allround tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Bridgestone (68%). In this particular case, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 has a better rating of 88% compared to 85% of the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO was done in 2021, compared to 2018 when was the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Tyre Reviews 2022 225/45 R17 test, where both the Weather Control A005 EVO and the Kinergy 4S2 H750 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 98% of Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO has A wet grip rating, whereas 95% of Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 has B rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Weather Control A005 EVO is made in Hungary/Italy and Kinergy 4S2 H750 is made in Korea.
| # | Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO | Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R21 | R14 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO Exemplary2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
2. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO Conditionally recommended
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow handling
Snow traction
Snow cornering
Snow acceleration
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Price/value
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | ||||||
| Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO | 1 | ||||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Test winner | 1 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,9 | 44,4 | |||||
| Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO | 41,4 | 44,4 | |||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 | 42,1 | 48 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1- | 1 | |||
| Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO Rating: Conditionally recommended | 2+ | 2 | 3 | 2- | |||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Good | 2 | 2+ | 1- | 3+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Wear | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 1 | ||
| Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2+ | 2 | 2 | 3+ | ||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37,6 | 50 | |||||
| Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO | 41,4 | 52,9 | |||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 | 40,3 | 52,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1 | ||||
| Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Exemplary | 1 | 2 | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||