• 7 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Bridgestone Weather Control A005 vs. Continental AllSeasonContact

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental allround tyres are slightly better rated (81%) than Bridgestone (70%). In this particular case, the Continental AllSeasonContact has a better rating of 88% compared to 67% of the Bridgestone Weather Control A005. Important for this comparison is also the Autoklub ČR 2020 205/55 R16 test, where both the Weather Control A005 and the AllSeasonContact were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Bridgestone Weather Control A005 has A wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Continental AllSeasonContact has B rating.

# Bridgestone Weather Control A005
/67%
Continental AllSeasonContact
/88%
DimensionsR15 - R19 R14 - R20
PriceSet your car's tyre size
TypeAllround Allround
SegmentPremium Premium
Tested9x 21x
Best place1. 205/55 R16 Autobild 20201. 205/55 R16 Autoklub ČR 2020
Worst place10. 205/55 R16 Autobild 202010. 225/50 R17 Autobild 2021
Average place5.56 3.52
Last test2020 2022
Best ratingRecommended 205/60 R16 ACE 2019Exemplary 195/65 R15 Autobild 2018
Worst ratingRecommended 205/60 R16 ACE 2019Sufficient 235/55 R17 ADAC 2020
Snow % %
Snow handling60.9% 88.1%
Snow traction52.7% 84.6%
Snow braking54.3% 85.7%
Snow cornering48% 94%
Snow handling - objective67% 94.3%
Snow acceleration77% 98.5%
Snow braking81% 91.3%
Wet %84.5 %
Aquaplaning - cross67.7% 80.8%
Aquaplaning - longitudal75% 77.9%
Wet braking94.7% 82.3%
Wet handling91.1% 84.4%
Wet circle cornering84% 84.6%
Wet handling - objective85% 82.7%
Dry %78.9 %
Dry braking89.4% 70.1%
Dry handling86.3% 78.3%
Dry handling - objective96% 84.6%
Safety83% 61.7%
Dry driving behavior80% 62%
Costs %82.7 %
Rolling resistance91.2% 88%
Price/value51.7% 71.8%
Mileage50% 81%
Wear71% 76%
Fuel efficiency86% 93%
Comfort %78 %
Exterior noise82.6% 80.2%
Comfort70.3% 74.9%
Interior noise69% 81.3%
Noise77% 72%
Ice % %
Ice braking83% 82%
Ice lateral guidance86% 84%

Mutual tests

Name Points totalWetDrySnow
Best values in test99,886,999,289,7
Bridgestone Weather Control A005
Rating: -
98,398,4106,989,7
Continental AllSeasonContact
Rating: -
99,8 99,3103,496,8
Show test details
Source:
Name WetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in test1-1-1-1
Bridgestone Weather Control A005
Rating: Good
1- 2+2-2-
Continental AllSeasonContact
Rating: Exemplary
2+21- 1-
Show test details
Source:
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test39,745
Bridgestone Weather Control A005
Rating: -
40,945
Continental AllSeasonContact
Rating: -
4348,6
Show test details
Source:
Name WetDrySnowIceNoiseWearFuel consumption
Best values in test2,02,63,02,42,70,61,5
Bridgestone Weather Control A005
Rating: Poor
2,0 2,6 5,42,4 2,92,01,9
Continental AllSeasonContact
Rating: Sufficient
2,63,63,0 2,4 3,01,51,5
Show test details
Source:
Name Points totalWinterWetDryRolling resistanceNoise
Best values in test200666649188
Bridgestone Weather Control A005
Rating: Recommended
18743654718 8
Continental AllSeasonContact
Rating: Highly recommended
200 5666 4618 8
Show test details
Source:
Name WetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in test22+1-1
Bridgestone Weather Control A005
Rating: Satisfactory
2 2+ 3+3
Continental AllSeasonContact
Rating: Good
2 2-2+1-
Show test details
Source:
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test39,546,3
Bridgestone Weather Control A005
Rating: -
39,746,3
Continental AllSeasonContact
Rating: -
42,649,9
Show test details
Source:
Name WetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in test2+21-1-
Bridgestone Weather Control A005
Rating: Not recommended
2+ 2 3-2-
Continental AllSeasonContact
Rating: Exemplary
2+ 2- 2+2+
Show test details
Source:
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test39,445,2
Bridgestone Weather Control A005
Rating: -
39,4 45,2
Continental AllSeasonContact
Rating: -
43,448,6
Show test details
Source: