Segment
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Premium
Comparison: Ceat 4 SeasonDrive vs. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Table of contents:
| # | Ceat 4 SeasonDrive
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
In the tyre comparison between the Ceat 4 SeasonDrive and the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750, there are a few important distinctions to be made. Both are allround types, manufactured by Ceat and Hankook respectively, but differed substantially in their test results and overall ratings.
The Ceat 4 SeasonDrive, made in India, managed to score an overall rating of 33%. The tyre was recognized for its good mileage, silent rolling noise, and affordable price, as reported by Autobild in 2018 and 2023. However, it lacked the performance in winter conditions with limited lateral control on snow and increased wet braking distances. In the Autobild comparison, it held the 34th position out of 35 tested tyres.
The Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750, on the other hand, carries a substantial advantage over its comparator, with a whopping overall rating of 89%. This tyre, produced in South Korea, replaced the previous model Hankook Kinergy 4S, elevating the quality on multiple aspects. It ranked 5th in the Autobild tyre test, thanks to its well-proven all-season performance, reliable handling on snow and ice, sharp steering response, and superior mileage. It did, however, noted slightly extended wet and dry braking distances and possessed average lifespan and efficiency.
The same source pointed out the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750's strongest features, which include cross aquaplaning, exterior noise, snow braking, and snow handling. The tyre showed an admirable winter professional with convincing driving characteristics on snow, short wet and dry braking distances, balanced comfort, and a moderate price level.
In conclusion, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 outperforms the Ceat 4 SeasonDrive not only in our rating but also in various tests, offering a more reliable, higher-performing all-round tyre option.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Exemplary2. Ceat 4 SeasonDrive Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Ceat 4 SeasonDrive Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37.7 | 45 | |||||
| Ceat 4 SeasonDrive | 40.8 | 50.1 | |||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 | 41.3 | 49.5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ceat 4 SeasonDrive Rating: Conditionally recommended | |||||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,9 | 44,4 | |||||
| Ceat 4 SeasonDrive | 44,9 | 63,7 | |||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 | 42,1 | 48 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
