Comparison: Ceat SportDrive SUV vs. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 SUV K127A
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Ceat) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (76%) than Ceat (51%). In this particular case, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 SUV K127A has a better rating of 85% compared to 46% of the Ceat SportDrive SUV. The first tyre test of Ceat SportDrive SUV was done in 2024, compared to 2021 when was the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 SUV K127A first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2024 235/55 R19 test, where both the SportDrive SUV and the Ventus S1 evo3 SUV K127A were tested.
| # | Ceat SportDrive SUV
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 SUV K127A
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R23 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 SUV K127A Exemplary2. Ceat SportDrive SUV Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 SUV K127A Recommended2. Ceat SportDrive SUV Satisfactory
Offroad
(Overall rating)Sand traction
Handling on gravel
Grass traction
Gravel traction
Mud traction
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ceat SportDrive SUV Rating: Satisfactory | |||||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 SUV K127A Rating: Good | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
