Segment
1. Continental AllSeasonContact Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear). Generally, GoodYear allround tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Continental (74%). In this particular case, the GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 has a better rating of 88% compared to 83% of the Continental AllSeasonContact. The first tyre test of Continental AllSeasonContact was done in 2018, compared to 2021 when was the GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 225/50 R18 test, where both the AllSeasonContact and the Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 98% of Continental AllSeasonContact dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 also have B wet ratings. We also know where AllSeasonContact is made - Slovakia/Czech Republic/France.
# | Continental AllSeasonContact
| GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R20 | R19 - R19 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Continental AllSeasonContact Premium
1. Continental AllSeasonContact Exemplary2. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 Very good
2. Continental AllSeasonContact Sufficient
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
Continental AllSeasonContact Rating: Good | 2+ | 2- | 1- | ||||
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 1- | ||||
Show test details |
Name | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Continental AllSeasonContact Rating: Very good | |||||||
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 Rating: Very good | |||||||
Show test details |