Segment
1. Continental AllSeasonContact Premium2. Kumho Solus HA31 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Continental allround tyres are slightly better rated (74%) than Kumho (65%). The first tyre test of Continental AllSeasonContact was done in 2018, compared to 2016 when was the Kumho Solus HA31 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the AllSeasonContact and the Solus HA31 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 98% of Continental AllSeasonContact has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Kumho Solus HA31 has C rating. We also know where AllSeasonContact is made - Slovakia/Czech Republic/France.
# | Continental AllSeasonContact
| Kumho Solus HA31
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R20 | R13 - R18 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Continental AllSeasonContact Premium2. Kumho Solus HA31 Upper-middle
2. Kumho Solus HA31 8.33
1. Continental AllSeasonContact Exemplary2. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory
1. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory2. Continental AllSeasonContact Sufficient
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | |||
Continental AllSeasonContact Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2+ | 1- | |||
Kumho Solus HA31 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 39,5 | 46,3 | |||||
Continental AllSeasonContact | 42,6 | 49,9 | |||||
Kumho Solus HA31 | 43,8 | 49,5 | |||||
Show test details |