• 8 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Continental AllSeasonContact vs. Kumho Solus HA31

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Continental allround tyres are slightly better rated (76%) than Kumho (52%). In this particular case, the Continental AllSeasonContact has a better rating of 76% compared to 31% of the Kumho Solus HA31. The first tyre test of Continental AllSeasonContact was done in 2018, compared to 2016 when was the Kumho Solus HA31 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the AllSeasonContact and the Solus HA31 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Continental AllSeasonContact has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Kumho Solus HA31 has C rating. We also know where AllSeasonContact is made - Slovakia/Czech Republic/France.

# Continental AllSeasonContact
/76%
Kumho Solus HA31
/31%

Add to comparison

DimensionsR13 - R20 R13 - R18
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Name WetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in test2+2+2+1
Continental AllSeasonContact
Rating: Good
22-2+ 1-
Kumho Solus HA31
Rating: Satisfactory
2-2+ 22+
Show test details
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test39,546,3
Continental AllSeasonContact42,649,9
Kumho Solus HA3143,849,5
Show test details