Segment
2. Nokian zLine Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Nokian (62%). But when it comes to comparing Continental ContiSportContact 5 and Nokian zLine, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 245/45 R18 test, where both the ContiSportContact 5 and the zLine were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 80% of Continental ContiSportContact 5 has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Nokian zLine has A rating.
# | Continental ContiSportContact 5
| Nokian zLine
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R16 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Nokian zLine Upper-middle
2. Nokian zLine 20.
2. Nokian zLine 7.38
1. Continental ContiSportContact 5 Very good2. Nokian zLine Recommended
2. Nokian zLine Recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | |||||
Continental ContiSportContact 5 Rating: - | 2- | 2- | |||||
Nokian zLine Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,2 | 0,8 | 3,0 | 1,3 | ||
Continental ContiSportContact 5 Rating: Good | 1,9 | 1,2 | 2,0 | 3,3 | 2,1 | ||
Nokian zLine Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 3,5 | 2,0 | ||
Show test details |
Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 278 | 146 | 143 | 25 | 10 | ||
Continental ContiSportContact 5 | 278 | 146 | 132 | 14 | 10 | ||
Nokian zLine | 240 | 119 | 121 | 22 | 9 | ||
Show test details |