Segment
1. Continental VanContact Winter Premium2. Nokian WR C3 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (96%) than Nokian (61%). But when it comes to comparing Continental VanContact Winter and Nokian WR C3, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ProMobil 2018 225/70 R15 test, where both the VanContact Winter and the WR C3 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 98% of Continental VanContact Winter has B wet grip rating, whereas 91% of Nokian WR C3 has E rating.
# | Continental VanContact Winter
| Nokian WR C3
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Continental VanContact Winter Premium2. Nokian WR C3 Upper-middle
1. Continental VanContact Winter Recommended2. Nokian WR C3 Conditionally recommended
1. Continental VanContact Winter Recommended2. Nokian WR C3 Conditionally recommended
2. Nokian WR C3 62%
2. Nokian WR C3 25%
2. Nokian WR C3 25%
2. Nokian WR C3 33%
2. Nokian WR C3 33%
2. Nokian WR C3 33%
1. Nokian WR C3 100%
1. Nokian WR C3 100%
1. Nokian WR C3 100%
1. Nokian WR C3 81%
2. Nokian WR C3 50%
Name | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Continental VanContact Winter Rating: Recommended | |||||||
Nokian WR C3 Rating: Conditionally recommended | |||||||
Show test details |