Segment
2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Sava Eskimo HP2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (80%) than Sava (61%). In this particular case, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 has a better rating of 98% compared to 75% of the Sava Eskimo HP2. The first tyre test of Continental WinterContact TS 870 was done in 2020, compared to 2017 when was the Sava Eskimo HP2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 225/45 R17 test, where both the WinterContact TS 870 and the Eskimo HP2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Continental WinterContact TS 870 has B wet grip rating, whereas 57% of Sava Eskimo HP2 has C rating. We also know where WinterContact TS 870 is made - France.
| # | Continental WinterContact TS 870 | Sava Eskimo HP2 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R15 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Sava Eskimo HP2 14.31
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Very good2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow traction
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Sava Eskimo HP2 71 dB
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 2,0 | |||||
| Continental WinterContact TS 870 Rating: Good | 2,0 | 2,0 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,2 | 3,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Rolling resistance | Noise | Wear |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,8 | 1,4 | 1,8 | 1,5 | 2,7 | 1,5 |
| Continental WinterContact TS 870 Rating: Good | 2,1 | 2,4 | 1,6 | 1,9 | 2,1 | 2,8 | 2,5 |
| Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,0 | 2,5 | 2,3 | 2,0 | 1,7 | 3,5 | 1,5 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Wear | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 1- | 1 | ||
| Continental WinterContact TS 870 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 1- | 2+ | 1 | ||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3 | 2- | 2 | 2 | 2+ | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 27,3 | |||||
| Continental WinterContact TS 870 | 34,2 | 27,7 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 36,5 | 28 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||