Segment
1. Nokian WR Snowproof Upper-middle2. Debica Frigo 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Frigo 2 vs. Nokian WR Snowproof
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Debica winter tyres are slightly better rated (57%) than Nokian (52%). The first tyre test of Debica Frigo 2 was done in 2018, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian WR Snowproof first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 72% of Debica Frigo 2 has C wet grip rating, whereas 86% of Nokian WR Snowproof has B rating.
| # | Debica Frigo 2
| Nokian WR Snowproof
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Nokian WR Snowproof 11.07
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Debica Frigo 2 Satisfactory2. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Debica Frigo 2 Satisfactory2. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory
