Segment
1. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle2. Debica Frigo HP Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Frigo HP vs. Nokian WR D4
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Debica (52%). But when it comes to comparing Debica Frigo HP and Nokian WR D4, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Debica Frigo HP was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Nokian WR D4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the Frigo HP and the WR D4 were tested.
| # | Debica Frigo HP
| Nokian WR D4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R17 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
1. Nokian WR D4 14.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR D4 6.04
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR D4 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR D4 Recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP | 41,1 | - | |||||
| Nokian WR D4 | 37,3 | 26,0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
