Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium2. Debica Presto HP Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Debica (45%). In this particular case, the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 has a better rating of 72% compared to 11% of the Debica Presto HP. The first tyre test of Debica Presto HP was done in 2018, compared to 2016 when was the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 195/65 R15 test, where both the Presto HP and the Ventus Prime3 K125 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 50% of Debica Presto HP has B wet grip rating, whereas 71% of Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 has A rating.
# | Debica Presto HP | Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R14 - R16 | R15 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium2. Debica Presto HP Lowcost
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Exemplary
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Conditionally recommended
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
Debica Presto HP | 37,4 | 40,7 | |||||
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 | 34,5 | 35,2 | |||||
Show test details |