Segment
1. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle2. Debica Presto UHP Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Presto UHP vs. Nokian Powerproof
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (62%) than Debica (58%). The first tyre test of Debica Presto UHP was done in 2020, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian Powerproof first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the Presto UHP and the Powerproof were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Debica Presto UHP has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Nokian Powerproof has A rating.
| # | Debica Presto UHP
| Nokian Powerproof
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R18 | R17 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian Powerproof 7.45
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Debica Presto UHP | 36,1 | 32,8 | |||||
| Nokian Powerproof | 32,9 | 29,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
